Nog geen aankondiging momenteel

Meer gloom & doom?:One earth, three planets' worth of da

Dit onderwerp is gesloten.
  • Filter
  • Tijd
  • Toon
Alles wissen
nieuwe berichten

    Meer gloom & doom?:One earth, three planets' worth of da

    Bron: The Scotsman Wed 25 Oct 2006 http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/uk.cfm?id=1577662006

    One earth, three planets' worth of damage

    ALASTAIR DALTON (adalton@scotsman.com)

    BRITAIN is living a "three-planet lifestyle", consuming resources at triple the rate the Earth can renew them, according to wildlife campaigners.

    WWF's biennial Living Planet report said each person is using the equivalent of six football pitches of resources to support the way we live.

    It said Britain had risen from 15th to 14th place among countries with the largest ecological "footprint" - placing the greatest demands on the natural world.

    WWF estimated that Scotland was doing only slightly better than the UK as a whole.

    Dr Richard Dixon, the director of WWF Scotland, said: "Somebody else, somewhere else, is paying the price of our consumption rates in Scotland, whether it is the rainforest in Brazil, the hippo in Uganda or the Savannah of South America."

    The group said the world's natural ecosystems were being degraded at a rate unprecedented in human history. On current projections, this means that as a whole, humanity will need at least two planets' worth of natural resources by 2050.

    The report said humanity's ecological footprint was 25 per cent greater than the planet's annual ability to provide everything from food to energy and recycle all human waste in 2003. The figure has increased from 21 per cent five years ago.

    James Leape, WWF's director general, said: "We are in serious ecological overshoot. The consequences of this are predictable and dire.

    "For more than 20 years, we have exceeded the earth's ability to support a consumptive life-style that is unsustainable and we cannot afford to continue down this path.

    "If everyone around the world lived as those in America, we would need five planets to support us."

    WWF said forests and fisheries will eventually be harvested to such a degree that they might disappear altogether.

    The report showed there was a one-third decline in the populations of more than 1,300 fish, bird and animal species between 1970 and 2003.

    It said the loss of natural habitat to farming has been particularly acute in the tropics. Pollution, tree-felling and over-fishing were major factors elsewhere, with climate change-causing fossil fuels the fastest-growing factor.

    The Scottish Environment Protection Agency said the report backed its own study, published this month, which highlighted evidence of dramatic environmental changes.

    Chris Spray, its director of science, said: "Even if you don't agree with what we have said, or what WWF is saying, it's important that we talk about the issues and priorities for our future."

    The Scottish Green Party said Scotland's "dismal record" on the environment was "depressing but not surprising".

    Mark Ruskell, its environment spokesman, said: "Limited progress in areas such as recycling is more than cancelled out by the Executive's insistence on building the Glasgow M74 and Aberdeen bypass and backing the aviation industry, despite the pollution these will create.

    "Ministers should be climate-proofing all policies, halting the expansion of motorways and airports, and prioritising support for the renewables industry."

    A spokesman for the Scottish Executive said: "We are aware of the importance of living within environmental limits and we're committed to building a sustainable future.

    "Our sustainable development strategy highlights the priorities we give to tackling the challenges of sustainable development."
    Biggest 'footprints'

    COUNTRIES with the largest ecological footprint per person are the United Arab Emirates, the United States, Finland, Canada, Kuwait, Australia, Estonia, Sweden, New Zealand and Norway. Denmark, France and Belgium/Luxembourg were also placed ahead of Britain, in 14th place.

    At the other end of the scale, Afghanistan had the smallest footprint, followed by Somalia, Bangladesh, Malawi and Haiti.

    Turkey was the European country with the smallest footprint.

    China was ranked 69th, but WWF said its size and rapid economic growth make it a key player in the sustainable use of the world's resources. WWF welcomed its pledge to cut energy consumption by a fifth over the next five years.
    Species under threat

    THE most under-pressure species include the swordfish, African bullfrog, pictured, and the South African Cape vulture. Those bucking the trend include rising populations of the Javan rhinoceros and the northern hairy-nosed wombat in Australia.

    But species in some habitats have declined far faster than the average 30 per cent fall from 1970 to 2003. Tropical terrestrial species are down by 55 per cent, although temperate species are fairly stable.

    The report also says mangroves - tidal forests - which provide nurseries for 85 per cent of commercial fish in the tropics, were cut by a third in the decade to 2000.

    " Footprints ", wat een interessant concept... Belgium/ Luxemburg? Zou Nederland daar niet gewoon tussen moeten staan? Opvallend ook dat de Scandinavische landen er zo slechts af komen terwijl ze er altijd prat op gaan zo mileubewust te zijn. Misschien leven ze wel in een ecologisch kwetsbaardere omgeving. Afganisthan en dergelijke lijken nog netjes in de steentijd te leven - erg milieubewust. Turkije ook? Hmm.
    "Zu groß, zu klein, Er könnte etwas größer sein..."

    Een soortgelijk bericht is hier te vinden:

    Tja, die voetafdrukken. Ik heb de mijne eens berekend en ik schrok er zelf ontzettend van.
    Vuja De': the strange feeling you get that nothing has happened before.


      Ja! Gevonden! Hier kun je je eigen voetafdruk berekenen:

      Hier mijn berekening:

      Mijn ‘footprint’ bedraagt 6,74 hectares. Dit is gebaseerd op de volgende antwoorden:

      De verdeling over de 4 categorieën is als volgt:

      Food Footprint = 2,51 hectares
      Transportation Footprint / 0,27 hectares
      Housing Footprint = 2,15 hectares
      Other Footprint = 1,82 hectares

      Totaal = 6,74 hectares

      Mijn voetafdruk meet 66,08% van een gemiddelde Noord-Amerikaan.

      Volgens de berekening geloof ik dat iedere persoon een bevredigend leven moet hebben als iedereen 1,98 hectare ter beschikking heeft voor zichzelf.

      Met bovenstaande cijfers gebruik ik 3,4 aardes.

      Deze berekening heb ik vorig jaar gemaakt (was onderdeel van een studie).
      Misschien wel leuk om hier jullie berekening neer te zetten als jullie hem zouden maken.
      Vuja De': the strange feeling you get that nothing has happened before.


        FOOD 1.5
        MOBILITY 0.7
        SHELTER 1.1
        GOODS/SERVICES 1.4





        Mmmh, daar ga ik dan met m'n goeie gedrag.. ben daarenboven nog een Wim Doorsnee ook. Ik kon nergens aan geven dat ik reuze efficient kan douchen en erg weinig verwarming nodig heb!
        "Zu groß, zu klein, Er könnte etwas größer sein..."


          De berekening is inderdaad veel te beperkt naar mijn smaak. Toch geeft het je een redelijk beeld van hoe je leeft. Ik dacht vorig jaar dat ik toch redelijk goed bezig was, maar het tegendeel bleek waar. Nu ik mijn auto niet meer heb zal die 'footprint' wel wat lager liggen, maar toch...
          Vuja De': the strange feeling you get that nothing has happened before.


            Ik kom op 4.3 hectare. Eigenlijk alleen omdat ik hier klein woon en niet veel thuis ben! Ik rijd veel met de auto, trouwens.
            The scientific theory I like best is that the rings of Saturn are composed entirely of lost airline luggage. ~ Mark Russell

            A MacBook user!


              De boodschap die dergelijke getallen overbrengen zal wel interessanter zijn dat de getallen zelf inderdaad. Het vertelt me wel dat we sinds zoiets als de uitvinding van de stoommachine van alles in een heel hoog tempo aan het op stoken zijn. Dat ik me af vraag of ik in de winter wel een krop sla wil eten, dat ik met recht mijn digibetische collega's die voor de zoveelste keer een pak A4 door de printer jagen om 2 bladzijden uit het rapportje te lezen, boommoordenaars mag noemen en dat anderzijds er een ekologiese maffia is die met vage argeumenten geen kans onbenut laat om me een schuldcomplex aan te praten. Gelukkig zijn deze bits en bytes 100% recyclebaar.
              "Zu groß, zu klein, Er könnte etwas größer sein..."